User profile: jchamberland
Joined: Jan. 5, 2007
Comments posted: 62
Contact jchamberland (log-in required)
Comments by jchamberland
Page 1 of 5 | Next
Posted on August 27 at 1:39 p.m.
Montel has a point. City Council gets emails all the time from citizens telling them what they should do. Moreover, Kiester should shut his trap as his emails will never be available for us to read...he broke the law and deleted them. There must have been some incriminating evidence in his emails.
Posted on August 27 at 1:35 p.m.
My thoughts and prayers go out to the Hannifin family. They are a good solid family and I hope Mai gets the help she needs.
On Marco Island woman charged with improper exhibition of firearm
Posted on June 30 at 11:12 p.m.
It seems to me that when Councilor Kiester states his opinion on the blogs he is breaking the Sunshine Law again. It is very inappropriate for one of our city councilors to post such negative comments about a fellow councilor.
As Issler wrote, Tucker has done a lot for our community and would have been reelected if was able to run for office again. On the other hand, Kiester will never be reelected if he is foolish enough to run again.
Posted on June 18 at 9:30 a.m.
Point is your arguement is ridiculous; he sides with no one. I think he gets a lot of pleasure voting on controversial topics to irritate people like you. Tucker can't overcome the charter but like any citizen he deserves the right to be heard. Like most naysayers you have selective hearing and selective memory.
On Former Marco Island City Councilman Glenn Tucker applies for city attorney job
Posted on June 17 at 10:57 p.m.
You are not watching the same meetings I am if you think Rob is a pansy, like Mr. Burger I would love to see any of you cowards have the courage to say these things to his face. At Mondays meeting he voted in the minority to not purchase property. Too many times to state but one memorial vote that shows he has more character than Avenger and Fossil combined was when he voted against the city, Tucker, Minozzi and Trotter to not accellerate the STRP. Once against you feeble minded cowards have selective memory...under anonymous blogs. How brave of you!
Jon Chamberland
On Former Marco Island City Councilman Glenn Tucker applies for city attorney job
Posted on February 12 at 7:33 a.m.
The only certifable nut is the campaign strategist that came up with the truck & sign plan and the people that were foolish enough to follow his lead!
Now back to the subject matter of this blog; I think Kiester has a lot of thinking to do. He is in a perilous situation, He can face the press and a possible recall, resign or spend two more years on council and accomplish absolutely nothing but just take up space. I guess we will see if Kiester has the best interest of Marco Island in mind or if he is still hooked on ruling by intimidation and arrogance and his own self-serving agenda.
On Collier judge finds Marco council member guilty of records violation
Posted on February 8 at 8:18 a.m.
Jimbo, Chuck broke the law and you are already talking about his next campaign for city council...are you crazy. He will need to survive a recall first. If he was smart he would resgn. There are a lot of angry voters on Marco that would love to see Chuck off of council!
On Collier judge finds Marco council member guilty of records violation
Posted on January 30 at 7:29 a.m.
Congatulations to the new Councilors elect, Gibson, Recker, Trotter and Waldack. Also, congratulatins to Councilors Minozzi, Popoff and Tucker for all they have endured. They DID listen to the people and were brave enough to do the right thing. It was a long difficult campaign and a strategy of truth and facts paid-off.
Also congratulations to the four opponents for participating in their community. The political process is a challenging one but the voters have spoken and it's time to heal and move forward.
Posted on January 11 at noon
I agree 27 Years. These candidates are a disgrace. I just don't get it, how much bonafied evidence do they need to understand that we must complete the STRP progarm on Marco?
Page 1 of 5 | Next
Posted on August 31 at 7:26 a.m.
McMullan may speak for you and a few others but NOT for the majority as proven by the results of the last election. If you choose to follow his lead that's your prerogative but don't think because you do everyone should. The man has a very troubled past and I choose to stay clear of him and his rhetoric. As the old saying goes, if you hang around dogs you’re gonna get fleas.
On Letter to the Editor: From roses to rabbits