Home › Island News › Local News
Marco seeking alternative ways of raising money
Property taxes may go down while fees and assessments may go up
STORY TOOLS
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
RELATED STORIES
- Marco support dwindles for community events under proposed budget
- Fire assessment bellows through Marco City Council
- Marco Island fire assessment moves step forward
More Local News
- YMCA cuts budget, staff
- Marco Community Bancorp launches private placement stock offering
- City Manager's Weekly Report
Share and Enjoy [?]
Tax reform and decreased property values may lead to lower taxes this year, however that doesn’t mean Marco residents will necessarily be paying less money to their local government.
Marco city councilors will be looking at several alternative funding measures at Monday morning’s general fund budget workshop.
City staff is seeking as many means as possible to make up a nearly $1.8 million dollar general fund shortfall. The shortfall is caused primarily by two consecutive years of decreases in taxable property values. The Collier County Appraiser’s Office estimated about a 9.5 percent reduction in Marco Island taxable property values from last year.
The city needs to either cut about $1.8 million from their expenses or raise that amount from residents.
According to a memo to City Council prepared by City Manager Steve Thompson and Finance Director William Harrison, the meeting will focus on “opportunities for reducing the city’s reliance on property taxes to fund essential municipal services.”
City Council will be reviewing three options prepared by staff. Each of the following options has varying effects on how much property owners will pay and how much the spending cap will be affected in future years. The spending cap limits most city expenses to no more than 3 percent increases plus COLA (cost of living adjustment) from one year to the next.
The three options are:
-Levy no new taxes and cut expenses by $1.76 million. This option would require the city to operate at $3.1 million less each year.
-Roll back taxes to last year’s level plus 4.15 percent as allowed by the Florida Legislature. The 4.15 percent is the growth in Florida personal income from last year. This will require a $1.3 million reduction in spending which will affect future year’s spending caps.
-Funding the Smokehouse Bay Bridges at the Esplanade by raising $13 million over five years to fund the two Collier Boulevard bridges. The money would be raised by using a combination of non-ad valorem taxes, such as a fire assessment, storm water utility fee and payment in-lieu-of taxes (PILOT). This will not require the city to lower their spending from last year.
“The two Collier Boulevard bridges past the Esplanade are certainly in no imminent danger of falling into the bay, but they do need to be replaced,” Harrison said, adding that he doesn’t have “$13 million sitting in the city’s checkbook.”
The fire assessment, Harrison said is not a new tax but rather a “shifting” of funding mechanisms to reduce the city’s dependence on property taxes.
The storm water utility fee would be a new fee charging all single family residents the same amount for their average storm water runoff. Commercial properties would be charged based on their square footage of surface that leads to storm water runoff compared to the average single family home’s square footage.
The PILOT funding mechanism would allow the city to charge properties such as the Marco Island Utility’s properties the taxes or assessments they would normally have to pay if they were privately run businesses.
“The first decision council will be making is what size of budget they want us to have next year. They first will determine the size of the pot,” Harrison said.
The next will be how to get that money, whether it’s through property taxes or a new tax by a new name.
The budget meeting is 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday in the Community Meeting Room downstairs from the police station, 51 Bald Eagle Drive.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Now is your chance to start planning.
Plan to dispute your appraised value of your real estate.
I know of a group of condo owners that are very much interested in doing this.
See:
http://www.collierappraiser.com
The "Property Appraiser" button
Then "Differing with the Property Appraiser"
#1 Posted by marcoredeagle on June 13, 2008 at 12:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
When the City took over the water company prices went up and now they want to take over the power company, can you imagine what you will pay for power, we already have a proven track record on that one. Next week they may be buying a McDonalds franchise and raising the rates on BIg Mac's
#2 Posted by marco909 on June 13, 2008 at 2:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The first decision the council members should make is: Where can we reduce the budget. They will not get any recommendations from staff on this. Staff only wants to point out how you can " hit Marco residents with more assessments, fees, charges [ utility or other ] or any new revenue sources to maintain or increase departmental budgets. Regardless of the attempt by the Florida State Legislature to reduce Local Government Spending, the Marco City Staff has their own game plan. Spend, spend, spend so our 4 by 6 mile Island can have more construction projects, more employees,more vehicles and equipment and maybe more government buildings to house our City Staff.
#3 Posted by SmokeyJoe on June 14, 2008 at 7:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Want to find alternative money fast? Do what every other community and government entitity does during times of cutbacks, reduce personnel, expenditures and fire all the planners! Give Rony Joel the same cut that the city received from the State. Lets see if Rony is as good at managing money as he is at convincing the Politicos that he always needs more of it. Another good way is to ban spending promoters Minozzi and Arceri from City Hall.
#4 Posted by bbyrone46 on June 14, 2008 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why do they require alternative revenue sources? They just passed a budget with 10 percent increases in spending. Good management practices dictate that you don't spend more then you have. What's up here?
#5 Posted by Fossil on June 17, 2008 at 8:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Would someone please explain what a storm water runoff is. Is it the extra water going into the sewers that needs to be processed or am I totally off base here?
The state government in NJ is proposing a tax based on the amount of rainfall. We do not have sewers in this area so it's just an extra way to get money from the residents based on nothing but the amount of rain.
#6 Posted by jmbaker on June 26, 2008 at 11:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)