Home › Island News › Local News
Marco council approves small mixed use development, multiple water facility upgrades
STORY TOOLS
RELATED STORIES
- Former contemporaries talk about Marco’s new ‘prince’
- Dog ordinance to be unleashed on Marco
- New Marco city manager contract approved at $160,000 yearly
More Local News
- Legacy: Little girl’s domestic legacy lives today on Marco Island
- Marriage amendment (man and woman) prompts rally in Collier, south Lee
- Cecelia Weeks, one of Goodland’s first residents, leaves Florida
Share and Enjoy [?]
Residents living next to empty lots can breathe a sigh of relief.
Piles of dirt and major pieces of construction equipment will not be stored in residentially zoned areas for the sewer lift stations to be installed over the next two years, after direction from City Council Monday night.
Council directed Public Works Director Rony Joel to request bids for the work based on the expectation that contractors would have to procure commercial properties on which to stage the construction.
“I think this really opens a light at the end of the tunnel here,” said Council Chair Bill Trotter.
Council put off making a decision from the April 7 meeting on where to stage the construction, asking Joel to go back and find an option that would not disrupt life for the island’s neighborhoods. Up for consideration during that meeting and on Monday was the possibility of using Veterans’ Community Park property to store dirt and heavy equipment. However, the parcel on the park land known as “Site B” was not a popular candidate for the staging.
“I won’t consider Site B,” said Councilor Rob Popoff. “The only thing I’ll consider for Site B is throwing some sod down.”
Joel estimated that asking contractors to rent “heavy commercial” property, zoned as C-5, would add about $35 to the price each new sewer customer would be forced to pay to connect to the central sewer system. He reminded council that customers in previous districts had to pay nothing because staging was performed entirely on city-owned property, including the south water treatment plant.
Interim City Manager Dana Souza told council the request for bids would go out with language restricting contractors to the use of C-5 zoned lands for staging, but requesting an estimate for a possible deduction for the use of Site B. Council agreed that if costs escalate too much as a result of using commercially-leased land to stage construction, it might have to resort to the option of using Veterans’ Community Park.
“This $35 is not written in stone,” said Councilor Jerry Gibson. “If it’s $75, yeah (I would consider Site B).”
In other news, council approved development of a mixed use building where the owner seeks to add three apartments to the upper story of the building that houses the Island Bike Shop. Council voted unanimously to follow staff recommendations that the development of the site would improve the building’s appearance and provide affordable housing for low-income workers on the island.
Council also approved roughly $13 million in contracts for wastewater and water treatment improvements and upgrades, all part of a multi-year plan to bring the city’s utility up to modern standards and make it capable of carrying increased capacity.
A high service pump station, an operations building and reclaimed water facility upgrades were all approved by council with relative swiftness. Every contract, plus contracts for oversight of some of the projects, was approved by a 7-0 vote, with the exception of the pump station, which was opposed by a lone vote from Councilor Ted Forcht.
Popoff cautioned those observing the meeting, however, that the approvals were not made without the council recognizing the gravity of the situation.
“We spent $13 million ... tonight,” he said. “I don’t want anyone to think for a second that that was easy to do. These were things we had to do. We may have seemed rather nonchalant taking quick motions and voting, but I thought a lot about this and I’m sure the rest of the council did too.”
Also, council voted to move forward with the installation of street lights along South Collier Boulevard, from Winterberry Drive to the end of Collier Court. The project lacked about $95,000 to complete, and council originally decided to put off the installation until budget workshops when the seven members could take the city’s overall budgetary picture into account.
However, council authorized $95,000 to be utilized from the Fiscal Year 2008 Construction Contingency Fund. The move was made just after council accepted a $95,064 grant from the South Florida Water Management District abandoned by another city.
By accepting the grant, the monies were applied retroactively to stormwater improvement projects already completed, and the funds originally spent on that project were replaced in the contingency fund before being moved over for the street light installation.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Yeah Rob, with nothing in the till, spending that 13 mil was real difficult. Guess the devil made ya do it!
Hey Jerry! 40 bucks extra on a $25,000 tab makes a real big difference, don't it? Get your head out of the martini shaker.
What's with this wastewater improvement? Wastewater to me says STRP. Wasn't we supposed to get all this extra reuse water from the STRP? Wasn't that Arceri's sales pitch? Didn't we already commit money to that? Now you want more? Boo! Hiss! Fraud!
#1 Posted by blackwidow on April 23, 2008 at 8:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice grammar blackwidow! "Wasn't we" ??? You from the Bayou like the Diaper Doctor??
#2 Posted by WoolyBully on April 23, 2008 at 10:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
balckwidow you anonymous coward; it is obvious you have never seen the city budget or a grammar book. If you did know anything about the city budget you wouldn't make such ridiculous statements. The city is in good financial shape, unlike you, I took the time to read the budget, you on the other hand just believe the garbage you heard from Hall and Neylon who made up fantasy numbers and created city debt for their failed campaigns. Why is it none of you idiots ever have the guts to print your name and say these kind of idiotic statements to Popoff or Gibson face to face?? You don't have the guts that's why. No real facts and no guts, just too much time on your hands…LOSER!
#3 Posted by ejburger on April 23, 2008 at 11:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"customers in previous districts had to pay nothing because staging was performed entirely on city-owned property"; another example of Rony Joel telling untruths. Was the property on a corner lot on North Barfield used for a massive dirt pile "city-owned property"? I saw private property used as staging areas in each district in which the STRP has had work. Why does this paper not even make an attempt to verify statements made by City employees? Rony is always telling untruths and never gets reprimended or corrected. This relationship between the Eagle and the City Staff is unhealthy.
#4 Posted by Fossil on April 24, 2008 at 7:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Burger,
I'm not very fond of spiders but I think blackwidow has a point (despite her bad grammar). Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the city run through its cash reserves and have to borrow $20 million from BofA to keep the STRP on track? A year or so ago, we had 30 to 50 million in reserves; now I believe we're down to 3 million. When the city issues the STRP revenue bonds, it presumably will replenish the pot but meanwhile we are in debt to the bank because we've spent our rainy-day funds. (Not a bad analogy as the hurricane season approaches!)
I think it's fair to question why we're spending 13 million we don't have. Where's that 13 million coming from? General revenues? Another bond issue? The water rate structure? Is everyone expected to pay for these "wastewater improvements" after we've just committed 138 million to do the STRP one of whose objectives was to increase the amount of reuse water? Or will only those who benefit from cheap reuse water pay the wastewater portion of the 13 million? For that matter, why are any reuse-water users getting a free ride on the STRP? These are valid questions. Perhaps you could enlighten me with valid answers.
When I attempted to ask similar questions of the council regarding the tiered water-rate structure and the STRP, I was pilloried by people like you and even by some councilors. Plenty of people stood up at council meetings and asked questions; we didn't get sensible answers!
And to set the record straight, with the exception of yourself and Ed Issler, I can't think of a single pro-city blogger who has identified himself/herself by name. They're more likely to be "avenging" something or other. On the other hand, Messers Hall, Neylon, Batte, Putnam, myself, Ms. Glaub and other bloggers opposed to some city policies always signed our blogs. When it comes to identifying yourself, anti-city bloggers have been much more forthcoming than pro-city bloggers.
Ed Foster
P.S. I also think blackwidow's question to Mr. Gibson is valid. Wouldn't you gladly spend $40 extra on your $25,000 STRP bill to keep Veterans Park a Park for two years? His comment that he would oppose using the park as a staging area if it cost each new STRP victim $35 but would reconsider if it cost $75 is absurd. We paid $10 million for this park that the city turned into a toxic waste dump. Wouldn't you pay $40 extra to keep it clean?
#5 Posted by EdFoster on April 24, 2008 at 9:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Fossil - you should check your facts before you go on a rant of criticism and condemnation. Mr Joel's statement was in reference to the construction of lift stations. These staging areas have never been on private property. The staging area you refer to was for the construction of the sewer lines in that district. Yes that was on private property. Another case of taking a kernel of truth and distorting that truth with misinformation. I think the Eagle reported an accurate statement by Mr Joel. If anyone is to be reprimanded it is you.
#6 Posted by luvmarisl on April 24, 2008 at 9:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ed, the Celebrate Marco crowd is not into facts, they're into healing the city(and making a few $$$ in the process) .
Did you know Wayne Waldack is a city councillor?!
#7 Posted by gernblanstone on April 24, 2008 at 3:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Gernblanstone,
Yes, I know. He also declared bankruptcy a few years back, has never held a "real" job as far as I can tell (unless you call taking care of mommy and selling refrigerators the kind of jobs that qualify one for city council) and claims a degree in Aeronautical Engineering from a college that doesn't offer a course in Aeronautical Engineering! Exactly the kind of guy we need handling our money on the council. Such is Marco! What can I say? He still got elected. I wonder how many people who voted the Arceri Party Line knew who they were voting for.
Now watch me get called names for simply repeating what is a matter of public record.
Ed Foster
#8 Posted by EdFoster on April 24, 2008 at 4:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
luvmarisl: You are wrong. A lift station well was dug and the station was constructed on North Barfield. The dirt was stored on that private site and one other on Hummingbird. I know that is so because I watched it happen. I watched every evening as the site was closed down, filled up and dug up again each morning. The dirt was carted back and forth morning and night. As for my checking my sources, that's not my job. I read a newspaper article and that article along with my personal observations are the only facts I as a reader require. I do not work for the Eagle or the City. You sir or madam are an enabler that cares not if a reporter is lazy or not! As for Rony Joel, he needs some accountability not encouragment. You are the one that needs to check the facts and carefully consider the sources you receive them from. Sometimes your own eyes do tell you the truth.
#9 Posted by Fossil on April 24, 2008 at 5:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Boy oh Boy. Fossil is a real HATER. Hates Dogs, Hates Joel, Hates everything.
Hey heres and idea Fossil,,,,,,,MOVE!
#10 Posted by happyonmarco on April 24, 2008 at 9:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Happyhardon,..the problem is you and the rest of your thug gang, Celebrate Marco...Chamber of Commerce... Marco Xmas style...etc... believe you are in the right because you tricked a few hundred or so condo owners into believing the STRP was the right thing for Marco. I'll tell you what(after QE pays out you guys in.. what do they call it,,? consultations fees??..)You have done unlimited harm to this paradise.!
I hope your nightmares catch up with your conscience.
#11 Posted by gernblanstone on April 25, 2008 at 11:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ed, we're gonna have to get together for another subway sandwich soon.
#12 Posted by gernblanstone on April 25, 2008 at 11:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
happyonmarco: You are wrong. I do not hate dogs nor do I hate Rony Joel. I simply believe that pet owners should be responsible for their pets and that public employees should be held accountable for their actions and what they say. Does your suggestion for me to move imply that you would like all Marco Island residents that are good responsible citizens expecting good honest stewardship from their public employees, all move too? Or just me because I dared to point this out?
#13 Posted by Fossil on April 26, 2008 at 7:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Foster, are you even a Marco Island resident?? Is your life that empty where you still feel the need to poke your obnoxious arrogant nose into our business? No one cares and no one listens to your pitiful misinformed rants.
#14 Posted by MarcoFacts on April 27, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gernblanstone,
Any time, but this time let's have it at a Subway that doesn't use "agressive" corrosive water to make its soda.
Regards,
Ed Foster
#15 Posted by EdFoster on April 28, 2008 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)