Login | Contact Us | Feedback | Customer Service | Site Map | Archives | RSS | Subscribe to the paper

HomeIsland NewsLocal News

Marco Council tackles bridge repairs

STORY TOOLS
Share on Facebook

All were in agreement that it is a pressing concern, but resolution on how to finance impending bridge repairs will have to wait as Marco City Council decided Monday night to put off taking steps to advance a funding plan for some $8 million in unbudgeted bridge repairs.

Council scheduled the issue for Monday’s special-called meeting after trimming capital improvement funds from the fiscal year 2008 budget. Some on the council expressed concern that the city was delaying critical projects to make room for state-mandated property tax rollbacks. However, the council seesawed back and forth Monday over how to free up the funds needed, and deferred a decision until more information could be gathered on the immediacy of the needs.

The issue will come back at a special-called meeting for Nov. 26, scheduled at 4:30 p.m.

Council further discussed creation of a special Fire Rescue Assessment, a possible step bandied about during an October council meeting. Creating the special funding plan for the city’s fire services would alleviate some of the burden the department places on the city’s annual budget. However, council discussed creation of the assessment in the same breath as it discussed using the alleviated funds for bridge repair.

“The reason to pass the fire rescue assessment is because of the state legislation — so we could fund part of the fire rescue effort to raise those funds, so we could fund other programs -— not to reduce taxes,” said Councilor Glenn Tucker. “The state rammed this thing down our throats.”

The future is uncertain for the Caxambas bridge, says Public Works Director Rony Joel. With a life span of 35 years, the bridge will not fall down tomorrow, says Joel, but the city is approaching a critical point for the bridge's repair needs.

LESLIE WILLIAMS / Eagle staff

The future is uncertain for the Caxambas bridge, says Public Works Director Rony Joel. With a life span of 35 years, the bridge will not fall down tomorrow, says Joel, but the city is approaching a critical point for the bridge's repair needs.

However, councilors Terri DiSciullo and Bill Trotter were more cautious about the creation of the assessment for the purpose of freeing up funds to be used elsewhere.

“I would feel more confident in having a referendum passed to pay for bridges — to have a reserve fund out there for bridges — if we reduced taxes through a fire assessment,” DiSciullo said. “It would be a special assessment. It’s up to (the voters) whether they want us to float a bond to pay for their bridges.”

Discussions seemed to run in circles as council bounced from the fire assessment to bridges and back again.

“We need to come to a consensus here. Are we talking about a fire assessment fee or are we talking about bridges?” Trotter asked.

Council, it seemed, could not talk about one issue without the other looming in the background.

Rony Joel, Marco Island's public works director, crouches on the sea wall below the Caxambas bridge to examine its pilings. With only minor work done in the last 34 years of the bridge's life, the wear and tear on the structure is obvious, particularly on the bridge's underbelly, says Joel.

LESLIE WILLIAMS / Eagle staff

Rony Joel, Marco Island's public works director, crouches on the sea wall below the Caxambas bridge to examine its pilings. With only minor work done in the last 34 years of the bridge's life, the wear and tear on the structure is obvious, particularly on the bridge's underbelly, says Joel.

If council decides in the next month to go forward with a special assessment for fire services, the process for getting voter approval and putting the plan into action would make the funds unavailable until the fiscal year 2009 budget.

Discussion also encompassed the suggestion of taking the funds out of the city’s dwindling reserves, expected to amount to roughly $4 million at the end of fiscal year 2007. Some of the residents who approached the podium Monday expressed concern that the city would endanger itself financially by dipping further into that pot of money.

That was the solution favored most by Councilor Ted Forcht, who said he wanted to see the funds put toward the initial engineering for a redesign of the Caxambas Bridge, which was engineered and built in 1973 to last 35 years.

Of the island’s 15 bridges, 10 were built before 1975. Most were built by the Deltona Corporation or the Mackle brothers, said Senior Project Engineer Tim Pinter. Those built before 2002 were designed to last 45 years at most.

“The majority were built by the developer,” he said. “Maybe one or two might have been developed by the state — maybe the one on Collier, over Smokehouse bay, since it was a state highway at the time.”

By the time that 36-year old bridge is ready for a budgeted replacement in 2012, engineers estimate that the dual spans over the bay will cost $12 million to replace, Joel said. The five-year Capital Improvement Plan has $4.7 million set aside for the project, leaving $7.8 million unbudgeted.

“Unfortunately, I don’t have a silver bullet solution,” Joel said. “There is a reality that our infrastructure we acquired from the county is reaching the end of its useful life. It may now be time to begin to look at investing in a dedicated funding scheme to upgrade our existing infrastructure.”

Though Joel said the North Collier bridges are the most pressing concern, they only rank second in the realm of expense, next to the bridge that links Caxambas Court to the rest of the island. That bridge, a span of roughly 200 feet, will cost $15 million to replace, Joel said.

It was built with a design life of about 35 years. With just two years left on its life expectancy, the city is in a difficult position to replace the bridge that serves the fewest residents on the whole island.

There are just 37 properties on the little strip of land, though they are some of the most valued and valuable ones in the whole city. And the bridge was built to reflect those low expectations of traffic, Pinter said.

“Because of the low volume of traffic for that particular design, it was built not as robust as other bridges,” he said. “It’s like any other street in the city too; it has garbage collection, it has mail delivery.”

Plus, he and Joel add, the area is a destination for tourists curious to check out the homes variously referred to as “megahomes” and “McMansions.”

In the Florida Department of Transportation’s annual bridge inspection, the Caxambas bridge was not deemed functionally obsolete, as some structures on the island were, thought it also did not pass with flying colors.

With a “health index” of 84.69, the bridge just barely falls under the category indicating that “some repairs are needed,” according to the Florida Department of Transportation. However, the literature on the ratings states that a lower health index “does not mean the bridge is unsafe.”

Caxambas Court resident Mark Merlowski echoed that sentiment Monday night when he cautioned the council to question whether the time was right to replace the bridge. Of the 30 or so homes on the tiny strip of land, Merlowski said, only a dozen or so are occupied at any given time. He reasoned that the responsibility to get off the island in the event of a hurricane lies with the residents of Caxambas Court alone, leaving safety concerns in the hands of residents.

Joel said there is no way of telling what strength of hurricane that bridge could withstand, though he and Pinter both pointed out that it would bear the brunt of a major storm as it makes landfall.

Of the island’s other bridges, several were named functionally obsolete, including the two bridges over Smokehouse Bay along North Collier Boulevard and the two bridges on Winterberry Drive.

Another, the Goldenrod Avenue bridge over Smokehouse Bay, was deemed structurally deficient. That term denotes a bridge the FDOT believes should undergo either repairs or replacement in the next six years. Repairs expected to add 17 years of life to the Goldenrod bridge are slated for 2008, with $150,000 allocated toward that work.

In all, the city has budgeted $910,000 in bridge repairs during the 2008 fiscal year.

The East Winterberry bridge is in the middle of replacement — council opted to build a new bridge rather than undertake the short-term repairs presented as an alternative. It is now in the demolition stage.

Scheduled for completion in the spring, the new structure is designed to last 75 years, a closer reflection of current design standards, Pinter said.

“The council, I think, has been proactive in addressing the city’s infrastructure needs,” Joel said. “Council made the decision to go with the long-term solution there, which was the best solution.”

That $6 million project is being funded by money from the city’s reserves.

As with many of the bridges, a $500,000 repair would have bought the East Winterberry bridge another five to seven years of useful life. Such a solution is possible for the Caxambas bridge too, though council’s comments Monday reflected an awareness of the awkward balancing act between repair and total replacement.

“We decided to go with the long-term solution when they could’ve spent $500,000 to $600,000 to fix the Winterberry bridge for now,” Council Chair Mike Minozzi said Monday. “(With that solution) you’re saving in the short run, but in the long-run, not at all.”

That East Winterberry bridge project was originally slated to receive a $1 million grant from the state, but after making it past the Florida house and senate, Governor Charlie Crist line-item vetoed $500,000 of the grant.

With reduced property tax revenues, starting next year, the state may be increasingly loathe to fund local infrastructure repairs.

Still, on Nov. 28, Joel and Minozzi are set to make a joint presentation to the legislature requesting another $1 million for “various bridge repairs.”

“We’re hoping that the governor puts a higher priority on infrastructure and does not veto this important grant,” Joel said.

Though stumping for federal funds is a possibility, said Joel, the complexities of acquiring such grants are many, with the city requiring an advocate in Washington.

That puts the ball back in the city’s court — something no amount of delay can remedy. Eventually, everyone is aware, someone must make a decision, and it is unlikely that anyone other than the Marco Island’s seven-member council will step up to the plate.

“I think council has a real challenge,” Joel conceded Monday before the meeting. “The do nothing alternative, I don’t think, is a possibility.”

• • •

By the numbers: bridge repair

15 bridges on the island

10 bridges built before 1975

7 slated for repairs in current or next fiscal budget

$8.5 million in unfunded bridge repairs

$15 million to replace Caxambas bridge

$700,000 to repair Caxambas to last another 5-7 years

Comments

This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.


Let’s review; the city has a new town hall, a new police station, beautiful lights on Collier Boulevard, video cameras on every stop light, a park property that we use as a dump for hazardous waste. Could it be that we spent too much of our cash reserves on things we did not need and that is why we are going broke? Nonsense, it is more important to have a swanky new office building for our city employees and a state of the art police department to fight all of the crime on the island, cameras to catch these hoodlums in action, we could not have done without street lights on collier boulevard and lord knows we need a 10 million dollar construction dump site for our friendly contractors to crush hazardous material on. All of this is much more important than safe bridges for the people to drive over. Another nice job by the city council, Ronny Joel and Bill Moss. Do you folks have any more great ideas? Please all of you take a long extended vacation.

#1 Posted by tptcolumbusway on November 13, 2007 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

could it be that we agree Joey?

#2 Posted by tptcolumbusway on November 13, 2007 at 11:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

We already pay for fire services to the county. We need to turn the MIFD over to Collier County so they can down size it and work it into the budget. MIPD needs to be cut in half or eliminated all together. The CCSO did fine here. Then we can fix our infrastructure, or at least its a start.

#3 Posted by strike3 on November 13, 2007 at noon (Suggest removal)

After reading the contract Mr Moss had here, one wonders what else will we find out about our past spending habits. The city council show be held accountable for this!

#4 Posted by JohninMarco on November 13, 2007 at 2:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Councilor Glenn Tucker said “The state rammed this thing down our throats.” Sound like the STRP Glen, now you know how many Marco Islanders feel.

#5 Posted by 15yearsmarco on November 13, 2007 at 4:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Lets see, there are 37 homes on caxambas island. At any given time only 12 are occupied. Maybe some type of autmated ferry capable of taking to cars and garbage truck across the narrow channel would sufice. I realize some will say that's crazy but sometimes you have to think outside the box. It's just one idea maybe others will come up with more.

#6 Posted by strike3 on November 13, 2007 at 4:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Strike3,

That bridge is not even needed, you could fill it all in and only cause a few boaters a 5 min. detour.
I don't know if the state would let you do it but it would be a better option then a ferry.

#7 Posted by 15yearsmarco on November 13, 2007 at 4:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

i doubt the voters will agree to any more taxes...so let the bozos take it to a vote.

#8 Posted by van on November 13, 2007 at 6:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Why were these bridges not repaired before we did all the other unnecessary stuff. What good is a renovated Collier Blvd. if you can,t drive on it? What good is having a new police station if the police can't reach all our neighborhoods? What good is expanding the sewer plant if the main lines are cut because a bridge collapsed? Who set these priorities? Last year we had 30 million in our reserve, this year there is only 4 million. Where did all our money go? Can we afford the same mind set for another 5 years? Vote for change, vote for reason, vote for solutions. Vote for Allen, Batte, Guidry, Hall and Neylon.

#9 Posted by bbyrone46 on November 13, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

what a picture of minozzi....concerned citizen....as cincerned as arceri.

#10 Posted by van on November 13, 2007 at 11:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Seven Million per mile for Collier Boulevard, but not a drop for bridges.
Thirty Million in Reserves, GONE!
Forty million in BOA and Revolving Loan new debt.
All this, and the council keeps right on spending.
What a legacy.

#11 Posted by numbers on November 14, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

To many of you are forgetting that the Marriott paid for over 33% of the Collier Blvd improvement. You also seem to forget that our Council is Democratically elected. Many (and maybe most) of the 14,000 permanent residents may actually like what is taking place. As we know, the median age of our residents is going down, more families, etc. This requires drainage, streets, parks, schools, etc. We can only hope that as many of the 14000 residents vote so we can see what direction we choose for our future.
Ed Issler

#12 Posted by lauralbi1 on November 14, 2007 at 8:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Issler,

Tell me how much did the Marriott pay for Collier Blvd.? I'll bet is was not even close to 33% of the cost. Maybe we should see if they want to help with the bridges.

#13 Posted by 15yearsmarco on November 14, 2007 at 9 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Marriott paid less than two million which is around 25% of the first contract for South Collier. The rest including change orders has been on the taxpayers. Marco debt is now touching $ 250 million. I repeat, what a legacy.

#14 Posted by numbers on November 14, 2007 at 10:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Tw'Issler please run for council. I need to ask you a few things at the canidates forums.

#15 Posted by exposed on November 14, 2007 at 11:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe the Marriott will step up to the plate and build a high school here? What do ya think Issler?

#16 Posted by strike3 on November 14, 2007 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Instead of disolving the police and fire departments, why doesn't joeywalnuts just move!

#17 Posted by talktome on November 14, 2007 at 4:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)



Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn: